In this case the complainant organisation, Confédération générale du travail (CGT), alleges that the “indivisible thirtieth” rule which is laid down by
Commission v. Luxembourg
By its application, the Commission of the European Communities asks the Court to hold that:
Rush Portuguesa v National Immigration Office
Interpretation of Article 5 and Articles 58 to 66 of the EEC Treaty and Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement